Decision Impact statements
Allen & Anor v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

 

This case concerned whether certain income of a superannuation fund received in its capacity of beneficiary of a trust estate was special income of the fund.
August v FCT This case concerned whether the profit made by the trustee of a trust from the sale of properties was income according to ordinary concepts or income of a capital nature.
Aussiegolfa P/L V FCT At issue in this decision was the application of the in-house asset provisions and sole purpose test in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) to a managed investment scheme (MIS) facilitating a ‘simulated direct investment’ in real property, including whether a distinct trust was created in respect of a particular investment by the trustee of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) in the MIS
Burton v FCT This case concerns entitlement to foreign income tax offsets (FITOs) under subsection 770-10(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 where an Australian resident pays tax in the United States of America (US) on a capital gain that is only partly assessable in Australia because of the CGT discount
Colonial First State Investments v FCT This case concerned the tax treatment of payments made by the trustee of a unit trust on the redemption of units; in particular whether redeeming unitholders would be assessed on trust capital gains apportioned to them.
Forrest v FCT This case concerned the deductibility of interest on money borrowed to acquire units in a hybrid trust.
Ghali v FCT This case concerned a superannuation fund that received distributions of income from a unit trust. The question before the AAT was whether those distributions were special income under s 273(6) or (7) of the ITAA36.
Greenhatch v FCT This case concerned the tax character of the share of the net income of a trust included in the taxpayer’s assessable income.
Harding v FCT At issue was whether the taxpayer, an individual, was a ‘resident’ of Australia for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 for the 2011 income year under either the ordinary meaning of resides (the ‘ordinary concepts test’) or under subparagraph 6(1)(a)(i) (the ‘domicile test’).
Hopkins v FCT This case concerned the assessment of the net income of a trust.
Howard v FCT This case concerned whether distributions of trust corpus received by an Australian resident individual in the 2006 income year from a Jersey Trust were assessable income of the taxpayer in that year.
Kafataris v FCT Whether CGT event E1 happened when a taxpayer’s interest in real property was placed on trust, which trust was in the nature of a superannuation fund of which the taxpayer was a member. In particular, whether the absolute entitlement exception in paragraph 104-55(5)(a) applied.
Lewski v FCT This case concerned among other things, the calculation and assessment of trust net income.
Raftland Pty PLD atf the Raftland trust v FCT Whether both the apparent appointment of the trustee of a loss trust as a tertiary beneficiary and the distributions of income to that beneficiary were a sham, or otherwise ineffective in equity.
Whitby Land Company P/L v FCT This case concerns the validity of assessments issued to a trustee.
Yazbek v FCT This case was about whether an individual was a ‘beneficiary of a trust estate’  in a year in which they received no distribution and if so, whether the Commissioner had a 4 year period to issue an amended assessment under s 170 ITAA 1936.